I love the West Wing. I’ve seen the whole thing at least 4 times. What I love the most is that it shows an aspirational form of politics where the two warring parties rehearse their ideological arguments in an honest and courageous manner and (with a few notable exceptions) the good guys win the debate in the end and some small progress is made.
And last month, a little bit of West Wing-style political vision came to the UK. Two former leaders of opposing parties stood up together and said (para-phrasing) “this is really important and we should be working together to do it better.”
“This” is science, technology and innovation.
On 22nd February, Tony Blair and William Hague published their co-authored report:
The essence of their argument is that we are in the midst of a 21st-century technological revolution but our state is not structured to make the most of this and the United Kingdom risks falling behind.
The essence of the need to change is centred on:
Much of the media focus relating to the report has centred on the relatively niche issue of the creation of a digital ID for each citizen – a topic which remains polarising but there has been less commentary on the central hope that the political parties can stop squabbling on the peripheries and focus on reshaping the agenda.
I may not yet see an 8th series of West Wing played out for real at the Palace of Westminster, but I keep optimistic because support for advancing technologies is crucial.
An overview of the UK’s updated PSC guidance, focusing on “significant influence or control” and how businesses can identify and assess PSC status in practice.
Read more
An overview of a recent High Court decision exploring increased transparency in family courts, with a focus on parental alienation and journalist access.
Read more
From 29 June 2026, the Crime and Policing Act 2026 (“CPA”) significantly expands corporate criminal liability in the UK. Companies and partnerships may now be held liable for any criminal offence committed by a senior manager acting within the actual or apparent scope of their authority, regardless of where the entity is incorporated. In practice, as we discuss in this note, application of the attribution test is not as straightforward as advertised and the likelihood of prosecution will depend heavily on the application of public interest factors.
Read more