https://hir.harvard.edu/artificial-intelligence-china-and-the-international-stage/
When we debate the merits of AI and AGI, it is hard not to think back to HAL, the highly advanced computer in Stanley Kubrick’s film, 2001 a Space Odyssey, whose super-human like intelligence enables him to guide a human crew through space and operate their ship.
While HAL initially supports the crew and seems eerily benevolent, the film develops into a frightening psychological and physical thriller played out in a battle for survival between humans and the computer they have created.
HAL’s voice, when he speaks, has a calm and controlled tone and HAL seems to be both logical and benevolent: “I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.”
While at first glance HAL’s comment seems to be about the importance of achieving one’s own full potential, it does not include or apply any importance to an individual’s moral duty or their responsibility to strive towards the achievement of a greater good.
As we develop AI, it is important to always be mindful of the remarkable achievements of computers and their potential, but at the same time to be aware of the need for the presence of a moral compass and a guiding hand to be applied to the technology that is being created – and the information being disseminated.
One of the key responsibilities of advisers in the private sector going forward may be to fulfil the role of providing this guidance and navigating these areas, especially while the laws around AI are still being developed.
This article explores the current approach of governments who are facing challenges in both navigating and controlling the wider use of AI and its development into AGI and balancing this with the civil liberties and human rights considerations which they are seeking to regulate.
While we continue to operate increasingly with AI, as professionals, and advisers, we need to be constantly mindful of both our ability to maximise our potential and of the technology we are using – and in particular to be conscious of our duty to ensure that anything we create or utilise is managed in a way to include values which we support and trust, or we are at risk like HAL’s crew, of being threatened by the advanced technology we create – perhaps in ways we can’t yet imagine.
An overview of a recent High Court decision exploring increased transparency in family courts, with a focus on parental alienation and journalist access.
Read more
From 29 June 2026, the Crime and Policing Act 2026 (“CPA”) significantly expands corporate criminal liability in the UK. Companies and partnerships may now be held liable for any criminal offence committed by a senior manager acting within the actual or apparent scope of their authority, regardless of where the entity is incorporated. In practice, as we discuss in this note, application of the attribution test is not as straightforward as advertised and the likelihood of prosecution will depend heavily on the application of public interest factors.
Read more
Significant reforms to the UK’s Enterprise Management Incentive (EMI) regime came into effect on 6 April 2026, marking the most substantial expansion of the scheme since its introduction. The changes are intended to modernise EMI for today’s growth economy by widening eligibility, increasing flexibility and simplifying administration. For scale ups and mid market businesses, the reformed regime presents a timely opportunity to revisit long term incentive planning.
Read more