After ten weeks, the UK government’s consultation on copyright and artificial intelligence (AI) closed last night. Launched on 17 December 2024, the consultation invited input from creatives, AI companies, and industry stakeholders alike, reflecting the government’s ongoing efforts in “supporting the growth of the creative industries and AI sectors while recognising the value of human-centred activity.”[1] The issue at hand? How to keep the UK attractive to AI companies while ensuring that the creative industries – whose work fuels many AI models – aren’t left behind.
Balancing act
At the core of the consultation was the government’s declaration that the existing copyright framework “does not meet the needs of (the) UK’s creative industries or AI sectors.”[2] Why so? Rights-holders argue that their works are being exploited without permission or payment, while AI companies assert they need access to vast amounts of data to remain competitive.
The government’s proposed approach is to find a solution which meets three key objectives:
Some of the government’s proposals include:
The consultation also sought comments on intellectual property rights in AI outputs, AI output labelling, and the use of AI in other sectors (namely education).
Next steps
The government will publish a summary of responses, likely leading to further consultations before any concrete changes.
For now, AI’s role in creative industries remains a growing topic of discussion. Campaigns such as Make it Fair[3] see unchecked AI as a threat to publishers and creators, while others argue that restrictive policies could stifle innovation and drive AI companies out of the UK. As discussions evolve, the challenge lies in creating a legal framework that harmonises these competing interests and ensures a sustainable path forward.
[1] https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/copyright-and-artificial-intelligence/copyright-and-artificial-intelligence, A.1.1
[2] https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/copyright-and-artificial-intelligence/copyright-and-artificial-intelligence, A.1.6
An overview of the UK’s updated PSC guidance, focusing on “significant influence or control” and how businesses can identify and assess PSC status in practice.
Read more
An overview of a recent High Court decision exploring increased transparency in family courts, with a focus on parental alienation and journalist access.
Read more
From 29 June 2026, the Crime and Policing Act 2026 (“CPA”) significantly expands corporate criminal liability in the UK. Companies and partnerships may now be held liable for any criminal offence committed by a senior manager acting within the actual or apparent scope of their authority, regardless of where the entity is incorporated. In practice, as we discuss in this note, application of the attribution test is not as straightforward as advertised and the likelihood of prosecution will depend heavily on the application of public interest factors.
Read more