Published in a Washington Post article, Professor of law, Johnathan Turley, received a ‘stomach-knotting’ email stating that he had appeared on a list of law professors that were accused of committing sexual offences.
A lawyer, assisting with a research project at the University of California, asked OpenAI to produce this list which featured Professor Turley’s name.
This led to the discovery of a Washington Post article detailing Professor Turley’s sexual misconduct against a student during a trip to Alaska in 2018.
The mind-blowing thing is: no such article exists because OpenAI created it.
In an interview with the real Washington Post, Professor Turley confirmed that he never took a class on a trip to Alaska nor had a student accuse him of sexual harassment.
Evidently, generative AI is capable of creation and can develop fake – albeit convincing – sources to corroborate its claim. What are the implications of this?
What would have happened if Professor Turley had been summarily dismissed because of this? In the UK it would potentially expose his employer to an unfair dismissal claim.
From an employment law perspective it may have a considerable impact on the employee’s livelihoods and reputations. Bear in mind, generative AI is unregulated. Its data scrapes across a myriad of sources and capable of creating googolplexes of content.
This should really reinforce the message to employers and HR staff that, in this day and age, not everything is as it seems, and thorough disciplinary investigations must take place before determining the fate of an employee.
However, the significance of this goes beyond employment law. It touches and concerns media law. What recourse would Professor Turley have had in defamation? How would this impact on the journalists that were claimed to have authored it? How would the media outlets be affected?
Please do look at my colleague, Emma Linch’s, article: Frankenstein’s Monster: ChatGPT ‘libels’ on what recourse Claimants in defamation proceedings may have considering that OpenAI, ChatGPT, and other AI language modules which are not natural people against whom defamation can be brought.
As always, if you need help navigating these unchartered territories, SMB are happy to help. Please contact joe.hennessy@smb.london to discuss further.
From 29 June 2026, the Crime and Policing Act 2026 (“CPA”) significantly expands corporate criminal liability in the UK. Companies and partnerships may now be held liable for any criminal offence committed by a senior manager acting within the actual or apparent scope of their authority, regardless of where the entity is incorporated. In practice, as we discuss in this note, application of the attribution test is not as straightforward as advertised and the likelihood of prosecution will depend heavily on the application of public interest factors.
Read more
Significant reforms to the UK’s Enterprise Management Incentive (EMI) regime came into effect on 6 April 2026, marking the most substantial expansion of the scheme since its introduction. The changes are intended to modernise EMI for today’s growth economy by widening eligibility, increasing flexibility and simplifying administration. For scale ups and mid market businesses, the reformed regime presents a timely opportunity to revisit long term incentive planning.
Read more
From April 2026, compensation limits and statutory rates will increase, affecting sick pay, minimum wage, family-related entitlements, dismissal and redundancy. Our Employment team have picked out the important changes and implementation dates to look out for.
Read more