Introduction
Sadly approximately 3.5 million people in the UK are affected by infertility. However, until recently it is a topic that has rarely been addressed in the context of the workplace. Obviously, fertility is an incredibly private issue with some employees wanting to keep it that way and some employers believing it to be a completely personal matter. Unavoidably, however, issues stemming from fertility treatments will impact on all aspects of a person’s life and, if neither side is willing to have an open discussion about it, nothing will change.
What are the challenges with fertility treatments?
Infertility is defined as a couple who are unable to conceive despite having regular and unprotected sex. Fortunately, modern medicine has advanced to a stage whereby fertility treatments may remedy such issues making conception possible in more cases than previously. Despite this, any fertility journey can arduous. It is expensive, lengthy, and demanding and there’s no guarantee that it will work in every case.
Alongside this, women must also contend with logistical and practical issues when balancing such treatments with work commitments. For example, a woman undergoing a course of IVF treatment will likely need to:
In addition, the man whose partner is undergoing IVF might also be struggling with his partner going through pain, the emotion of the treatment itself as well as dealing with the emotion should it not be successful.
The role of the employer
Undoubtedly, an employer’s involvement in this process will impact on whether this is a positive or negative experience for their employee. A notable comment in the CIPD’s report was that one of the women it interviewed explained that, due to the demands of her role, she left her job in order to focus on her IVF treatment. From this one might deduce that the employer was not sympathetic to the time off needing to be taken or the emotion involved in going through the process.
On the other hand, employers who do value their employees’ health and wellbeing are likely to have recognised and considered an employee’s concerns and have developed a support framework to allay those fears. For instance, an employee may, among other things, be worried about:
For all the good an employer can do, they are not mind-readers and there is some onus on employees engaging in open communication as well. Of course, an employee’s willingness to do so will largely be influenced by the culture of their working environment and also whether they can have their concerns dealt with confidentially.
Legal protection
Currently there is no specific legislation dealing with fertility treatment as such but instances of sex discrimination may also occur in fertility cases, but the point at which the legal protection starts is nuanced. For women undergoing IVF treatment, the European Court of Justice held in Mayr v Backerei that the period starts at the time the ova (eggs) are collected until the implantation of a fertilised ovum in the uterus (this decision was adopted into English & Welsh law following the case Shonta v Home Office and Pipkin). So, the less favourable treatment of a women undergoing fertility treatment must occur during this period for her to benefit from the protection.
It has always been wise to set out an employer’s approach to a particular issue in a policy and this might provide protection against allegations such as sex discrimination, but shortly the obligations on an employer in this area are likely become more than just best practice considerations.
Future considerations
Currently at its second reading in the House of Commons is the proposed Fertility Treatment (Employment Rights) Bill which intends to enshrine in law an employee’s rights to take paid time off to attend fertility appointments as well as the protections afforded to them as they undergo treatment.
Until a time where that Bill becomes law, our advice to employers is to:
SMB’s employment team is at hand to advise you in navigating this tricky area of employment law as well as assisting with the drafting of a new policy.
The Online Safety Act (OSA) establishes a broad regulatory framework for providers of user-to-user services and search services with links to the UK. Service providers that fail to comply with the OSA face serious financial and legal consequences. Notably, Ofcom has the authority to impose fines of up to £18 million or 10% of global revenue, making non-compliance a significant risk for digital businesses.
Read moreOn 14 March, SMB was instructed by former postmaster, Lee Castleton OBE, to issue proceedings in the High Court against the Post Office and Fujitsu.
Read moreAfter ten weeks, the UK government’s consultation on copyright and artificial intelligence (AI) closed last night. Launched on 17 December 2024, the consultation invited input from creatives, AI companies, and industry stakeholders alike, reflecting the government’s ongoing efforts in “supporting the growth of the creative industries and AI sectors while recognising the value of human-centred activity.
Read more