In this edition:
• The EAT hold that an ET did not identify the proper basis for a claim that enhancing maternity pay but not shared parental pay could be indirectly discriminatory and did not apply the correct pool for comparison.
• The Court of Appeal confirm that a last straw in a continuing series of breaches of contract can result in a successful constructive dismissal claim even though earlier breaches of contract had been accepted.
• The Government issues guidance on what the Home Office will do to help employers wishing to offer a job to ‘Windrush’ case applicants who do not have the documents to prove their right to work in the UK.
• A city worker who uploaded photos of a colleague from her social media account

SMB's Sarah Harding and Charlie Geyton have represented the mother in the first case dealt with by the Court of Appeal involving the Child Focused Courts (previously known as the Pathfinder Scheme).
Read moreThe Spear's indices are widely regarded as trusted guides to the leading advisers serving high-net-worth and ultra-high-net-worth individuals and families.
Read moreSimon Goldberg, appeared on ITV News discussing the judgment in the Associated Newspapers litigation brought by Prince Harry et al.
Read more