Yesterday, my colleague mused whether her client could sign a contract using her “known as” name rather than her given name. A number of us agreed “yes, she could,” after all, a signature is merely evidence of agreement and not a pre-requisite to agreement. As I have explained to many people; no-one asks you to sign when you buy a Wispa before hopping on your train home, so a signature cannot be required to make a contract binding.
The pre-requisites for the formation of a contract are an intention to create legal relations, offer, acceptance and consideration. Contracts are often oral or implied by conduct and now our Canadian counterparts (who also have a common law system) have confirmed that the use of emojis in text based conversation can be used to communicate these core concepts – this seems a natural progression to me.
From the Guardian: Canadian judge rules thumbs-up emoji can represent contract agreement
A look at the landmark $18 billion Meta settlement and what it signals for the future of online safety regulation, platform design, and child protection in the UK and beyond.
Read more
The CMA is taking a tougher approach to consumer protection. This article examines recent enforcement action on drip pricing, green claims and dark patterns, and what businesses should do to minimise regulatory risk.
Read more
An overview of the UK’s updated PSC guidance, focusing on “significant influence or control” and how businesses can identify and assess PSC status in practice.
Read more