Yesterday, my colleague mused whether her client could sign a contract using her “known as” name rather than her given name. A number of us agreed “yes, she could,” after all, a signature is merely evidence of agreement and not a pre-requisite to agreement. As I have explained to many people; no-one asks you to sign when you buy a Wispa before hopping on your train home, so a signature cannot be required to make a contract binding.
The pre-requisites for the formation of a contract are an intention to create legal relations, offer, acceptance and consideration. Contracts are often oral or implied by conduct and now our Canadian counterparts (who also have a common law system) have confirmed that the use of emojis in text based conversation can be used to communicate these core concepts – this seems a natural progression to me.
From the Guardian: Canadian judge rules thumbs-up emoji can represent contract agreement
This article examines three significant case studies that demonstrate how emerging technologies intersect with key areas of law and regulation. These include: the use of AI-based chatbots for customer service in the context of consumer rights; generative AI in relation to the Online Safety Act; and the application of generative AI in creating advertisements under the CAP Code.
Read more
The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumer Act 2024 (DMCC) regulates large technology providers, expands CMA powers, and introduces new consumer protections.
Read more
Following its first consultation on the future of security of tenure for business tenants under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (“Act”), the Law Commission has issued an interim statement, indicating that only limited reforms are currently being proposed.
Read more